Comments on: Alex Evans: Sony are “not in it for a quick buck” https://criticalgamer.co.uk/2010/10/04/alex-evans-sony-are-not-in-it-for-a-quick-buck/ Sat, 18 Dec 2010 19:51:19 +0000 hourly 1 By: exxbot https://criticalgamer.co.uk/2010/10/04/alex-evans-sony-are-not-in-it-for-a-quick-buck/comment-page-1/#comment-12357 exxbot Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:37:46 +0000 https://criticalgamer.co.uk/?p=12228#comment-12357 great short article! it made my day great short article! it made my day

]]> By: David Macphail https://criticalgamer.co.uk/2010/10/04/alex-evans-sony-are-not-in-it-for-a-quick-buck/comment-page-1/#comment-12225 David Macphail Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:14:00 +0000 https://criticalgamer.co.uk/?p=12228#comment-12225 It's obvious that videogame quality is what's important to Sony, look at how much time they've given to Polyphony Digital to make sure that GT 5 is absolutely perfect. As opposed to Microsoft who rush out 2 Halo and Forza games every year like there won't be a tomorrow. It's quality that counts, which is why Sony have GOTY winners like Uncharted 2 and Microsoft got stuck with laughable attempts at games like Halo Wars. It’s obvious that videogame quality is what’s important to Sony, look at how much time they’ve given to Polyphony Digital to make sure that GT 5 is absolutely perfect.

As opposed to Microsoft who rush out 2 Halo and Forza games every year like there won’t be a tomorrow.

It’s quality that counts, which is why Sony have GOTY winners like Uncharted 2 and Microsoft got stuck with laughable attempts at games like Halo Wars.

]]>